Breast cancer risks associated with missense variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Leila Dorling, Sara Carvalho, Jamie Allen, Michael T Parsons, Cristina Fortuno, Anna González-Neira, Stephan M Heijl, Muriel A Adank, Thomas U Ahearn, Irene L Andrulis, Päivi Auvinen, Heiko Becher, Matthias W Beckmann, Sabine Behrens, Marina Bermisheva, Natalia V Bogdanova, Stig E Bojesen, Manjeet K Bolla, Michael Bremer, Ignacio Briceno, Nicola J Camp, Archie Campbell, Jose E Castelao, Jenny Chang-Claude, Stephen J Chanock, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, NBCS Collaborators, J Margriet Collée, Kamila Czene, Joe Dennis, Thilo Dörk, Mikael Eriksson, D Gareth Evans, Peter A Fasching, Jonine Figueroa, Henrik Flyger, Marike Gabrielson, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, Montserrat García-Closas, Graham G Giles, Gord Glendon, Pascal Guénel, Melanie Gündert, Andreas Hadjisavvas, Eric Hahnen, Per Hall, Ute Hamann, Elaine F Harkness, Mikael Hartman, Frans BL Hogervorst, Antoinette Hollestelle, Reiner Hoppe, Anthony Howell, kConFab Investigators, SGBCC Investigators, Anna Jakubowska, Audrey Jung, Elza Khusnutdinova, Sung-Won Kim, Yon-Dschun Ko, Vessela N Kristensen, Inge MM Lakeman, Jingmei Li, Annika Lindblom, Maria A Loizidou, Artitaya Lophatananon, Jan Lubiński, Craig Luccarini, Michael J Madsen, Arto Mannermaa, Mehdi Manoochehri, Sara Margolin, Dimitrios Mavroudis, Roger L Milne, Nur Aishah Mohd Taib, Kenneth Muir, Heli Nevanlinna, William G Newman, Jan C Oosterwijk, Sue K Park, Paolo Peterlongo, Paolo Radice, Emmanouil Saloustros, Elinor J Sawyer, Rita K Schmutzler, Mitul Shah, Xueling Sim, Melissa C Southey, Harald Surowy, Maija Suvanto, Ian Tomlinson, Diana Torres, Thérèse Truong, Christi J van Asperen, Regina Waltes, Qin Wang, Xiaohong R Yang, Paul DP Pharoah, Marjanka K Schmidt, Javier Benitez, Bas Vroling, Alison M Dunning, Soo Hwang Teo, Anders Kvist, Miguel de la Hoya, Peter Devilee, Amanda B Spurdle, Maaike PG Vreeswijk, Douglas F Easton

OAI: oai:www.repository.cam.ac.uk:1810/338428 • DOI: 10.17863/CAM.85841

BACKGROUND: Protein truncating variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2 are associated with increased breast cancer risk, but risks associated with missense variants in these genes are uncertain. METHODS: We analyzed data on 59,639 breast cancer cases and 53,165 controls from studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium BRIDGES project. We sampled training (80%) and validation (20%) sets to analyze rare missense variants in ATM (1146 training variants), BRCA1 (644), BRCA2 (1425), CHEK2 (325), and PALB2 (472). We evaluated breast cancer risks according to five in silico prediction-of-deleteriousness algorithms, functional protein domain, and frequency, using logistic regression models and also mixture models in which a subset of variants was assumed to be risk-associated. RESULTS: The most predictive in silico algorithms were Helix (BRCA1, BRCA2 and CHEK2) and CADD (ATM). Increased risks appeared restricted to functional protein domains for ATM (FAT and PIK domains) and BRCA1 (RING and BRCT domains). For ATM, BRCA1, and BRCA2, data were compatible with small subsets (approximately 7%, 2%, and 0.6%, respectively) of rare missense variants giving similar risk to those of protein truncating variants in the same gene. For CHEK2, data were more consistent with a large fraction (approximately 60%) of rare missense variants giving a lower risk (OR 1.75, 95% CI (1.47-2.08)) than CHEK2 protein truncating variants. There was little evidence for an association with risk for missense variants in PALB2. The best fitting models were well calibrated in the validation set. CONCLUSIONS: These results will inform risk prediction models and the selection of candidate variants for functional assays and could contribute to the clinical reporting of gene panel testing for breast cancer susceptibility.

Breast Cancer Genetic epidemiology Missense variants Risk prediction Breast Neoplasms Case-Control Studies Female Genetic Predisposition to Disease Humans Mutation Missense