The fallacy of amelioration

Sheree Bekker, Penny Paliadelis, Caroline F Finch

OAI: oai:purehost.bath.ac.uk:openaire_cris_publications/5a63a09f-8d33-4f54-9c1e-8b3e787a1b2e • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tsm2.31

Knowledge Translation, as a component of implementation science, has seen extensive popularisation in Sport and Exercise Medicine (SEM) over recent years. However, in seeking better and more influential outcomes, much of SEM appears to be following Knowledge Translation fashion and fad, over ensuring function and form. This has meant that key concepts in Knowledge Translation have been conflated, the work oversimplified, and potential outcomes overhyped. In this paper, Knowledge Translation is, first, defined as a process. Next, we show how oversimplified versions of Knowledge Translation rely on the ‘fallacy of amelioration’, with problematic consequences and unintended outcomes. Finally, we move to rethinking Knowledge Translation in SEM by showing how the field can move forward through embracing Knowledge Translation as a complex process to maximise the influence and impact of its work.

KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION EFFICACY effectiveness intervention injury prevention complexity